![](Logos/pixel.gif) |
![](images/pixel.gif) |
![](images/pixel.gif) |
![](images/pixel.gif) |
![](images/pixel.gif) |
![](images/pixel.gif) |
![](images/pixel.gif) |
For
further information, to suggest a seminar
speaker, or to subscribe to the Dynamics Systems Seminar mailing list,
please contact
the webmaster.
|
![](images/pixel.gif) |
![](Logos/pixel.gif) |
![](images/pixel.gif) |
![](images/pixel.gif) |
|
![](Logos/pixel.gif) |
![](Logos/pixel.gif) |
![](Logos/pixel.gif) |
![](Logos/pixel.gif) |
Dynamics talks in
the UH
Graduate Student Seminar
- 04/19/2013,
Matthew Nicol.
- 10/05/2012,
Vaughn Climenhaga.
Randomness and determinism in dynamical systems
Many interesting phenomena are modelled by dynamical systems for
which the state of the system evolves according to some
deterministic rule — nevertheless, these phenomena often appear to
behave randomly over long enough time scales. (The canonical
example is the weather.) I will explain where this randomness comes
from, how the tools of dynamical systems allow us to make
meaningful predictions for such systems, and what some of the
challenges are in extending the theory more broadly.
- 3/23/2012,
William Ott.
- 4/22/2011,
Matthew Nicol.
- 11/06/2009,
William Ott and Chinmaya Gupta.
Dynamical Systems: A probabilistic
viewpoint
The presence of instabilities in models of physical processes often
makes it practically impossible to simulate individual orbits for
long periods of time. It is therefore natural to view dynamical
systems probabilistically, an idea that can be traced back to
Boltzmann and the development of statistical mechanics. Although
dynamical systems defined by flows or maps are deterministic, they
can nevertheless give rise to time series that look as if they were
generated by stochastic processes with strong independence
properties. In this talk we will introduce the probabilistic
viewpoint and discuss one particular manifestation: Borel-Cantelli
lemmas for dynamical systems.
- 04/13/2007,
Michael Field.
Chaos and Structure in Dynamics
The talk is about how randomness can
arise in deterministic dynamics and how we can
measure and quantify randomness. We indicate how in
systems which are statistically indistinguishable
from fair coin tossing we can nonetheless see
structure.
- 03/30/2007,
Andrew Török.
Models for chaos: from Markov chains to Young
towers
Some systems that look chaotic can be
described by a relatively simple symbolic dynamics (trajectories in a
finite graph, with specified transition probabilities). These are the
"uniformly hyperbolic" systems, considered in the 1960's by Dmitri
Anosov and Stephen Smale. However, many chaotic systems exhibit only
"non-uniformly hyperbolic" behavior. A model to describe these was
introduced in the late 1990's by Lai-Sang Young. We will sketch these
models, and discuss consequences one can derive from them.
- 10/20/2006
Matthew Nicol.
Probabilistic Techniques in Dynamics
- 04/01/2005,
Andrew Török.
Understanding Chaos: The Lorenz attractor
Studying a simple ODE, Lorenz discovered in
1963 an object that is called today a strange attractor: nearby
points are attracted to a set of fractal dimension, and move around
this set chaotically.
Understanding this attractor was one
of the 18 problems for the twenty-first century proposed by Field
medalist Steven Smale.
Namely: Is the dynamics of the ordinary
differential equations of Lorenz that of the geometric Lorenz
attractor of Williams, Guckenheimer, and Yorke? Tucker answered this
question in the affirmative in 2002. His technical proof makes use of
a combination of normal form theory and validated interval
arithmetic.
The goal of this talk is to explain what it
means to understand systems that look
chaotic. Link to
Andrew Török's website for more information.
- 04/30/2004,
Mr. Philip D Jacobs.
Symmetric Expanding Attractors
Attractors are topological structures which
are useful in the study of dynamical systems. This talk will first
sketch the development of expanding attractors from 1) the classical
solenoid attractor of S. Smale to 2) generalized solenoid attractors by
R. Williams to 3) the introduction of symmetry into Williams'
structures by M. Field, I. Melbourne, and M. Nicol. The symmetry is by
way of a finite group acting on 3-space. In the case of Field,
Melbourne and Nicol, the group acts freely on the expanding attractor.
I will then discuss recent developments to construct expanding
attractors on which the finite group action is not free.
- 04/16/2004,
Matthew Nicol.
Brownian motion and applications
We briefly describe the mathematical theory of
Brownian motion and give applications to PDES, chaotic dynamical
systems and mathematical finance.
- 03/05/2004,
Andrew Török.
Knots, Braids, and Operator Algebras
We will describe how seemingly unrelated
fields, knot theory (low dimensional topology) and von Neumann
algebras (a topic of Functional Analysis), were connected when
Vaughan Jones discovered a new knot invariant. [In part for this
work, Jones received the Fields Medal in 1990. A link about V. Jones
is
at here.]
- 04/04/2003,
Mike Field.
The Structure of Deterministic Chaos
It is now well known that deterministic
dynamical systems can behave "chaotically". But what does this
actually mean and how can we measure it? In this talk we explore what
is meant by terms such as "random" and show how simple
deterministic systems can have statistics indistinguishable from
coin-tossing. The talk will include a visual component where we will
show some of the intricate structure that can be embedded within
chaotic systems.
|
![](Logos/pixel.gif) |
![](Logos/pixel.gif) |
![](Logos/pixel.gif) |
![](Logos/pixel.gif) |
|
|